Draft Environmental Impact Report

MEPA Rejects Developers’ DEIR!

Last June, EEA Secretary Tepper rejected the Hanscom developers’ DEIR and instructed them to go back to the drawing board to produce an SDEIR (Supplementary DEIR) -- in large part owing to 1,500+ critical public comments that were submitted (see below), along with 13,500 petition signatures opposing the proposed development, and an important independent analysis which refuted the developers’ outrageous claims.

The SDEIR is still pending and expected to be filed in coming months.  When the SDEIR is filed, we’ll fight it as hard as the DEIR. Visit our home page often, so we can keep you posted!

Boston Globe Story - State officials reject environmental impact review of Hanscom Airport expansion

To read Secretary Tepper’s rejection (Certificate) of the developers’ DEIR, click here.

To read Public Comments from Government Officials, Organizations, and Individuals, see below

To see the developers’ DEIR, click here.

For more information on the DEIR including Key News Stories, Tools, and Resources, click here

DEIR Public Comments

Government

  • Federal

  • State

  • Regional

  • Towns & Cities

Organizations

  • National

  • State

  • Regional

  • Local

Individuals

  • Sample Comments

  • All Comments

Individuals

“I am a high school student from Winchester Massachusetts…The last thing we should be doing right now is encouraging and expanding [private jet infrastructure]. The airport has released a DEIR which is missing some vital information to make it look more environmentally friendly than it is…”

Read the full comment here

“As an MD who retired ten years ago to volunteer with a climate organization, I am deeply concerned about the proposal to expand hanger space at Hanscom. While I do not live locally, the contribution of the proposed expansion to the climate crisis affects us all. If I submitted this DEIR as representing "informed consent" for a patient, I would be sued for malpractice… the report claims that hanger expansion will only serve the need that already exists; it ignores the predictable increased demand.

Read the full comment here

“As a parent, I am concerned about climate change and the environment that my children are inheriting... I bear a personal responsibility to future generations to make these sacrifices of effort and increased expense. At the town-wide level, Concord initiatives are reducing climate impact as well… the Hanscom expansion is a calamity for our climate and a slap in the face to people in MA who are working hard to do the right thing... The people of MA are watching and counting on you!

Read the full comment here

The Climate Change portion of the draft environmental impact report is shockingly inadequate... Massachusetts must not continue expanding facilities for the most climate-damaging elements of our transportation system. The proponents' environmental impact report should be judged unacceptable until it clearly documents the complete impacts of their proposed development.”

Read the full comment here

“The overall expected impact of this project will be great environmental harm to the region and the planet, negative impact on wildlife, and immeasurable harm to priceless national treasures, including the birthplace of our national liberty and the environmental movement.“

Read the full comment here

“I… spent [my] entire career building electrified mass transit projects throughout the United States. After a career in building green transportation infrastructure, I am appalled that the developers of the proposed Hanscom Northfield Development would greenwash the project and present it as being a net zero project. The reality is that it would have a huge environmental impact lasting for many decades into the future… The developer’s anticipated reduction in emissions from ferry flights, by their own admission, is 2% – 3% less than current. Similarly, a thorough independent study concludes that the reduced ferry flights would be insignificant.”

Read the full comment here

“We urge you to consider the potential hardships that these decisions impose on our residents. Is it “just” for the Commonwealth to compel an elderly person or child to choose between necessities and reducing carbon in the atmosphere caused by private jets being used to transport financially secure individuals?

Read the full comment here